# Plain Language Summary: Davis-Bacon Repeal Act

This bill would eliminate a nearly century-old federal law that requires workers on government-funded construction projects to be paid a minimum wage based on what's considered standard in their area. Right now, when the federal government funds construction work—like building roads, bridges, schools, or other public infrastructure—contractors must pay workers what's called a "prevailing wage," which is typically the wage that union workers or experienced workers in that region earn for similar work. This bill would get rid of that requirement entirely, allowing contractors to pay whatever wage they negotiate with workers, as long as it meets the federal minimum wage.

The practical effect would be that construction workers on federally-funded projects could potentially earn significantly less than they do today. Supporters of this bill argue it would lower costs for taxpayers and make government construction projects cheaper and faster to complete. Critics counter that it would reduce pay for construction workers, potentially drive down wages across the entire construction industry, and could lead to lower-quality work since contractors might hire less experienced workers at lower wages. The bill would take effect 30 days after it becomes law but wouldn't apply to construction contracts that are already signed or bids that are already out for bidding when the law takes effect.

Davis-Bacon Repeal Act

Good, Bob

Davis-Bacon Repeal Act This bill repeals the Davis-Bacon Act, which requires that the locally prevailing wage rate be paid to various classes of laborers and mechanics working under federally-financed or federally-assisted contracts for construction, alteration, and repair of public buildings or public works. References in any law to a requirement under the Davis-Bacon Act shall be null and void.